The year was 1979.
The 80’s were approaching. Personal computers, the end of
the Cold War, and amazing hair metal
bands were on the cusp of infiltrating
radio waves and hair salons everywhere.
But before any of the glories of the 80’s could happen-
Francis Ford Coppola’s Vietnam masterpiece Apocalypse
Now had to be robbed of winning Best Picture.
Coppola didn’t just have a good film this year either by the
way. He had a huge DECADE. He co-wrote Patton, the 1970 Best Picture winner and directed The Godfather Parts 1 and 2, which won best picture in 1970 and 1972 respectively.
Apocalypse Now was
a well-documented film. The budget was insanely huge, it took way too long to
complete, there were a lot of offscreen mess-ups and the actors didn’t get
along with each other.
But for what it was worth, the film was a triumph.
Vietnam
was the most polarizing and explosive time in our nation’s history up until
that point. And the film represented the experiences of war, and the Vietnam struggle
for what they are. Dark,
visceral, scary, and often times disturbing.
Honestly, if you have not seen this movie, please do. It
isn’t just a movie. It is a glimpse into the face of war, a look into the catastrophe
which violence causes and it is one of the greatest films of all time.
With that being said, the movie which did win Best Picture in 1979 was Kramer v Kramer.
Kramer v Kramer
was a film starring Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep. Two of the most well-known
actors of all-time in their primes (even though Streep is still going
ridiculously hard today). Kramer was not
as violent. It was not as disturbing. And it wasn’t as gripping. But it was an
important film nevertheless.
Kramer v Kramer
was a film about a couple struggling for the custody of their child. The film
was the first major picture to bring the issue of divorce and its effect on
children to the mainstream. Just as much as Apocalypse Now was about an
important event in our nation’s history, so was Kramer v Kramer. The
Divorce rate in America doubled from 1960 to 1980.
This left a lot of kids and families hurting. Kramer V Kramer resonated more with
audiences going through the pains of separation. Apocalypse Now on the other hand brought up a time that most
Americans wanted to forget.
But even still, the film is beautifully dark. It makes you
almost feel that you were in Vietnam.
![]() |
Napalm was featured heavily in the film during war scenes. |
And I believe that is why it didn’t win. It was too real. It represented the
ugly side of humanity. It showed all of the horror which could occur.
But that’s why it should have won. It was not Hollywood trying
to educate America about a problem in a dramatic way. It was Coppola giving
Hollywood and the world a look into how insane war is. How insane we all can be
when faced with horror.
Sources
The Evolution of
Divorce- W. Bradford Wilcox
http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-evolution-of-divorce
Poster
Free to use
Napalm
Napalm
Andrew LCPL Pendracki, 2003
http://www.imdb.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment